Efectos sociales de la I+D público-privada: el rol de la acumulación de capacidades sistémicas en la respuesta argentina al COVID-19
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59339/de.v63i240.623Palabras clave:
ciencia, industria, Covid-19, Fonarsec, conocimientoResumen
La investigación conjunta es un esquema de cooperación potencialmente virtuoso para generar aprendizajes en la parte pública y efectos beneficiosos en la sociedad. El trabajo se propone, a partir de la experiencia argentina en la pandemia de Covid-19, analizar la trama de capacidades, relaciones y efectos generada, a lo largo del tiempo, por una serie de proyectos financiados por el Estado en 2010, para esclarecer el nexo entre efectos de aprendizaje y
efectos sociales. Se utilizó una metodología cualitativa centrada en el método de estudio de casos múltiples, donde cada caso abarca proyectos financiados por el Estado que derivaron posteriormente en diferentes soluciones para el Covid-19. El trabajo identifica un proceso de aprendizaje público que integra tanto los aportes de la industria como la dimensión intelectual de los beneficios económicos; conceptualiza el proceso de acumulación de capacidades como un multiplicador de efectos sociales que emergen a medida que el conocimiento es reutilizado; identifica la articulación entre diferentes esquemas como condición para que los efectos de aprendizaje y los efectos sociales se manifiesten a lo largo del tiempo.
Descargas
Citas
Ankrah, S.N., Burgess, T.F., Grimshaw, P. y Shaw, N.E. (2013). Asking both university and industry actors about their engagement in knowledge transfer; what single-group studies of motives omit. Technovation, 33(2-3), 50-65.
Ankrah, S., Al-Tabbaa, O. (2015). Universities–industry collaboration: a systematic review. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 31, 387–408.
Arocena, R. y Sutz, J. (2005). Latin American Universities: From an original revolution to an uncertain transition. Higher Education, 50(4), 573-592.
Arza, V., Carattoli, M., (2017). Personal ties in university-industry linkages: A case-study from Argentina. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42, 814-840.
Azoulay, P., Jones, B. (2020). Beat COVID-19 through innovation. Science, 368 (6491), 553.
Banal-Estañol, A., Jofre-Bonet, M., Lawson, C. (2015). The double-edged sword of industry collaboration: Evidence from engineering academics in the UK. Research Policy 44, 1160- 1175.
Bikard, M., Vakili, K., Teodoridis, F. (2019). When collaboration bridges institutions: The impact of university–industry collaboration on academic productivity. Organization Science 30, 426-445.
Bornmann, L. (2013). What is societal impact of research and how can it be assessed? A literature survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 64, 217-233.
Brem, A., Viardot, E., Nylund, P.A. (2021). Implications of the coronavirus (COVID-19) outbreak for innovation: Which technologies will improve our lives? Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 163, 120451.
Callaert, J., Landoni, P., Van Looy, B., Verganti, R. (2015). Scientific yield from collaboration with industry: The relevance of researchers’ strategic approaches. Research Policy 44, 990-998.
Cohen, W.M., Nelson, R.R. y Walsh, J.P. (2002). Links and impacts: the influence of public research on industrial R&D. Management Science, 48(1), 1–23.
Cunningham, P., Gök, A. (2012). The Impact and Effectiveness of Policies to Support Collaboration for R&D and Innovation. Nesta Working Paper No. 12/06.
De Fuentes, C., Dutrénit, G. (2012). Best channels of academia–industry interaction for long term benefit. Research Policy, 41(9), 1666-1682.
De Jong, S., Barker, K., Cox, D., Sveinsdottir, T., Van Den Besselaar, P. (2014). Understanding societal impact through productive interactions: ICT research as a case. Research Evaluation, 23(2), 89–102.
D'Este, P. y Patel, P. (2007). University-industry linkages in the UK: What are the factors determining the variety of interactions with industry? Research Policy, 36(9), 1295-1313.
D'Este P. y Perkmann M. (2011). Why do academics engage with industry? The entrepreneurial university and individual motivations. Journal of Technology Transfer, 36(3), 316-339.
D’Este, P., Llopis, O., Rentocchini, F. y Yegros, A. (2019). The relationship between interdisciplinarity and distinct modes of university-industry interaction. Research Policy, 48(9), 103799.
Eisenhardt, K.M. (1989). Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532-550.
Fini, R., Rasmussen, E., Siegel, D., Wiklund, J. (2018). Rethinking the commercialization of public science: From entrepreneurial outcomes to societal impacts. Academy of Management Perspectives, 32(1), 4–20.
Freeman, C. (2004). Technological infrastructure and international competitiveness. Industrial and Corporate Change, 13(3), 541-569.
Garcia, R., Araújo, V., Mascarini, S., Santos, E., Costa, A. (2020). How long-term university industry collaboration shapes the academic productivity of research groups. Innovation 22, 56-70.
Gulbrandsen, M., Smeby, J.C. (2005). Industry funding and university professors’ research performance. Research Policy, 34(6), 932–950.
Hottenrott, H., Lawson, C. (2017). Fishing for complementarities: Research grants and research productivity. International Journal of Industrial Organization 51, 1-38.
Iorio, R., Labory, S., Rentocchini, F. (2017). The importance of pro-social behaviour for the breadth and depth of knowledge transfer activities: An analysis of Italian academic scientists. Research Policy, 46, 497-509.
Lee, Y.S. (2000). The sustainability of university–industry research collaboration: an empirical assessment. Journal of Technology Transfer, 25(2), 111–133.
López-Martínez, R.E., Medellin, E., Scanlon, A.P., Solleiro, J.L. (1994). Motivations and obstacles to university–industry cooperation (UIC): a Mexican case. R&D Management, 24(1), 17–31.
Mansfield, E. (1995). Academic research underlying industrial innovations: Sources, characteristics, and financing. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 77(1), 55–65.
Meyer-Krahmer, F. y Schmoch, U. (1998). Science-based technologies: university–industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27(8), 835-851.
Milesi, D., Verre, V. y Petelski, N. (2017). Science-industry R&D cooperation effects on firm’s appropriation strategy: the case of Argentine biopharma. European Journal of Innovation Management, 20(3), 372-391.
Nelson, R. (Ed.). (1993). National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Study. Oxford, Reino Unido: Oxford University Press.
Newig, J., Jahn, S., Lang, D.J., Kahle, J. y Bergmann, M. (2019). Linking modes of research to their scientific and societal outcomes. Evidence from 81 sustainability-oriented research projects. Environmental Science and Policy, 101, 147–155.
Nieminen, M. y Kaukonen, E. (2001). Universities and R&D networking in a knowledge-based economy. A glance at Finnish developments. Sitra Reports, serie 11, Helsinki, Sitra.
Owen-Smith, J. y Powell, W.W. (2001). Careers and contradictions: faculty responses to the transformation of knowledge and its uses in the life sciences. In St. Vallas (ed.), Transformation of Work. Research into the Sociology of Work (Vol. 10, pp. 109–140), Greenwich, JAI Press,.
Perkmann, M. y Walsh, K. (2009). The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university-industry relations on public research. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(6), 1033-1065.
Perkmann, M., Neely, A. y Walsh, K. (2011). How should firms evaluate success in university—industry alliances? A performance measurement system. R&D Management, 41(2), 202—216.
Perkmann, M. y West, J. (2014). Open science and open innovation: sourcing knowledge from universities. In: Link, AN, Siegel, DS, Wright, M (Eds.), The Chicago Handbook of University Technology Transfer and Academic Entrepreneurship. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 41–74.
Perkmann, M., Salandra, R., Tartari, V., McKelvey, M., Hughes, A. (2021). Academic engagement: A review of the literature 2011–2019. Research Policy, 50(1), 104-114.
Ramos-Vielba, I., Sánchez-Barrioluengo, M., Woolley, R. (2016). Scientific research groups’ cooperation with firms and government agencies: motivations and barriers. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41, 558-585.
Reale, F. (2021). Mission-oriented innovation policy and the challenge of urgency: Lessons from Covid-19 and beyond. Technovation, 107, 102306.
Rentocchini, F., D'Este, P., Manjarrés-Henríquez, L., Grimaldi, R. (2014). The relationship between academic consulting and research performance: Evidence from five Spanish universities. International Journal of Industrial Organization 32, 70-83.
Rosenberg, N. y Nelson, R.R. (1994). American universities and technical advance in industry. Research Policy, 23, 323–348.
Rossi, F., Rosli, A. & Yip, N. (2017) Academic engagement as knowledge co-production and implications for impact: Evidence from Knowledge Transfer Partnerships. Journal of Business Research, 80, 1-9.
Schartinger, D., Rammer, C., Fischer, M.M. y Frohlich, J. (2002). Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy, 31(3), 303-328.
Stake, R. (1995). Investigación con estudios de caso. Madrid: Ediciones Morata.
Verre, V., Milesi, D., Petelski, N. (2020). Cooperación ciencia-industria: ¿puede aprender también la parte pública?”, Revista Iberoamericana de Ciencia Tecnología y Sociedad (CTS), 15(43), 11-33.
Verre, V., Milesi, D., Petelski, N. (2021). Science-Industry Cooperation: What are the Benefits for the Public Part? Evidence from Argentine Biopharmaceutical Sector. International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 18(3), 1-22.
Walker, J., Brewster, C., Fontinha, R., Haak-Saheem, W., Benigni, S., Lamperti, F., Ribaudo, D. (2022). The unintended consequences of the pandemic on non-pandemic research activities. Research Policy, 51, 104369.
Wei, F., Zhou, H., Gao, G., Zheng, Q. (2022). Analysis of trends in patent development for coronavirus detection, prevention, and treatment technologies in key countries. Journal of Biosafety and Biosecurity, 4, 23-32.
Yaqub, O., Malkov, D., Siepel, J. (2022). How unpredictable is research impact? Evidence from the UK’s Research Excellence Framework. SPRU Working paper.
Yin, R. (1984). Case Study Research. Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks: California: Sage Publications.
Zhao Y., Liu L., Zhang C. (2022). Is coronavirus-related research becoming more interdisciplinary? A perspective of co-occurrence analysis and diversity measure of scientific articles. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 175, 121344.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia
LicenciaLa aceptación del manuscrito por parte de la revista implica la no presentación simultánea a otras revistas u órganos editoriales y la cesión no exclusiva de los derechos patrimoniales de los autores en favor del editor, quien permite la reutilización, luego de su edición (postprint), bajo licencia Creative Commons 4.0. Atribución-NoComercial-CompartirIgual (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Se puede compartir, copiar, distribuir, alterar, transformar, generar una obra derivada, ejecutar y comunicar públicamente la obra, siempre que: a) se cite la autoría y la fuente original de su publicación (revista, editorial y URL de la obra); b) no se usen para fines comerciales; c) se mantengan los mismos términos de la licencia.
Se deja constancia que el referido artículo es inédito y que no está en espera de impresión en alguna otra publicación nacional o extranjera.
Por la presente, acepta/n las modificaciones que sean necesarias, sugeridas en la revisión por los pares (referato), para adaptar el trabajo al estilo y modalidad de publicación de la Revista.
