Vaca Muerta: myths and realities

Authors

  • Coremberg Ariel Director del Centro de Estudios de la Productividad de la Universidad Torcuato Di Tella, investigador del Instituto Interdisciplinario de Economía Política de Buenos Aires y profesor de la Universidad de Buenos Aires

Keywords:

Development macroeconomics, Natural resources, Energy, Nonrenewable energy, Project evaluation

Abstract

This paper measures the wealth and potential income generation of unconventional fuels from Vaca Muerta shale formation in Argentina, the second unconventional gas and the fourth unconventional oil reservoir in the world, according to standard investment valuation methodology.

This Valuation methodology takes into account several income projections, investment and operational costs, learning curves, initial productivity and expected performance of wells, spot and forward prices, and latest regulatory framework in Argentina.

Potential revenues and investments would not make Argentina a hydrocarbon world power as Saudi Arabia. Vaca Muerta shale play’s potential income would not allow Argentine society to be “saved” defined as boosting consumption effortlessly just because of Vaca Muerta’s wealth.

Its potential output would not generate enough foreign exchange to the point of being an alter­native to agricultural exports (including exports of manufacturing agro based products), and hence, becoming a tool to fix the country’s chro­nic external gap. Moreover, the magnitude of potential revenue (with extreme hypothesis of null internal gas consumption and total replacement by unconventional gas) would amount to only 50% of the traditional Argentinean exports.

High probability benchmarking scenario shows that Vaca Muerta wealth value (net present value, npv) is nearly 7% of Argentinean gross domestic product (gdp). Calibration of more extreme lower probability scenarios, suggests that net present value could reach not more than 30% of gdp.

Our findings contrast with a popular call from politicians that value the formation by a multiple equivalent to 10 times Argentina´s gdp, without taking into account the economic and commercial feasibility of expected income and costs by traditional definitions of reserves.

However, Vaca Muerta is an investment oppor­tunity that could impact on Argentinean hydro­carbons market and the economy of Neuquén province, contributing to the necessary transi­tion towards a more renewable-centric energy matrix.

Special products such as unconventional oil and gas, soybeans as well as other natural resource-based goods could trigger investment opportunities, but would not enable Argentine society as a whole to to live of rents”.

To achieve the desired objective of economic and social development, Argentina needs to sustain economic growth in a stable macroeconomic framework, taking advantage from its human and natural resource endowment by increasing do­mestic savings, investment and productivity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ape [Área de Pensamiento Estratégico] (2014). “Vaca Muerta y su impacto en la infraestructura”. Área de Pensamiento Estratégico, serie Nº 23, Cámara Ar¬gentina de la Construcción.

Arrow, K. J. (1962). “The Economic Implications of Learning by Doing”, Review of Economic Studies, vol. 29, Nº 3, junio, pp. 155-173.

Banco Mundial (2006). “Where is the Wealth of Na¬tions? Measuring Capital for the 21th Century”. Washington: Banco Mundial.

——— (2011). “The Changing Wealth of Nations. Mea¬suring Sustainable Development in the New Millen¬nium”. Washington: Banco Mundial.

Coremberg, A. (2015). “Accounting for Natural Resour¬ces Wealth and Productivity from sna and Beyond”, Testing Natural Resource Curse for Oil and Gas De¬pendent Countries, version adaptada presentada en iariw-oecd Special Conference on “W(h)ither the sna?”, París, 16-17 de abril.

Corrado, C., Hulten, C. y Sichel, D. (2005). “Mea¬suring Capital and Technology: An Expanded Fra¬mework”, en Corrado, C., Haltiwanger, J. y Sichel, D. (eds.), Measuring Capital in the New Economy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, cap. 1, pp. 11-46.

Curtis, T. (2016). “Unravelling the us Shale Producti¬vity Gains”, oies paper: wpm 69, Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. Oxford: University of Oxford.

Damodaran, A. (2017). “Equity Risk Premiums (erp): Determinants, Estimation and Implications”, The 2017 Edition. Database a enero 2017. Disponible en <http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~adamodar/>.

Di Sbroiavacca, N. (2015). “Shale Oil y Shale Gas en Argentina. Estado de situación y prospectiva”, Cua¬dernos de Investigación, Nº 5, serie Económica, pp. 142-168.

Dixit, A. K. y Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

eia [Administración de Información Energética de Esta¬dos Unidos] (2013). “Technically Recoverable Shale Oil and Shale Gas Resources: An Assessment of 137 Shale Formations in 41 Countries Outside the United States”, junio, eia.

Gomes, I. y Brandt, R. (2016). “Unconventional Gas in Argentina: Will it become a game changer?”, oies paper: ng 113. Oxford: The Oxford Institute for Ener¬gy Studies.

Hamilton, K. y Hartwick, J. M. (2005). “Investing Ex¬haustible Resource Rents and the Path of Consump¬tion”, Canadian Journal of Economics, vol. 38, Nº 2, pp. 615-621.

Hulten, C. R. (2006). “The ‘architecture’ of capital ac¬counting: Basic design principles”, en Jorgenson, D. W., Landefeld, J. S. y Nordhaus, W. D. (eds.), A new architecture for the U.S. national accounts. Chi¬cago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 193-214.

Koopmans, T. C. (1947). “Measurement Without Theory”, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 29, Nº 3, agosto, pp. 161-172.

Lund, D. y Oksendal, B. (eds.) (1991). Stochastic Mo¬dels and Option Values. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Repsol ypf (2012). “Comunicado de Prensa”, Madrid, 8 de febrero.

Reuters (2017). “Petrolera argentina ypf proyecta caída de producción de un 3 pct en 2017”, 10 de mayo.

Romer, P. M. (1986). “Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth”, Journal of Political Economy, vol. 94, Nº 5, octubre, pp. 1002-1037.

seea [Sistema de Contabilidad Ambiental y Económi¬ca] (2014). “System of Environmental-Economic Accounting 2012. Experimental Ecosystem Accoun¬ting”. Nueva York: onu-ue-fao-ocde.

Sheshinski, E. (1967). “Optimal Accumulation with Lear¬ning by Doing”, en Shell, K. (ed.), Essays on the Theory of Optimal Economic Growth. Cambridge, ma: mit Press, pp. 31-52.

sna [Sistema de Cuentas Nacionales] (2008). “System of National Accounts. Developments since 2008”. Nueva York: Eurostat-fmi-ocde-onu-Banco Mun¬dial.

Stokey, N. L. (2009). The Economics of Inaction Sto¬chastic Control Models with Fixed Costs. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Tobin, J. (1969). “A general equilibrium approach to monetary theory”, Journal of Money Credit and Ban¬king, vol. 1, Nº 1, pp. 15-29.

ypf (2016). “Four Years of Vaca Muerta”, diciembre.

Published

2022-06-27

How to Cite

Ariel, C. . (2022). Vaca Muerta: myths and realities. Desarrollo Económico. Revista De Ciencias Sociales, 59(228), 213–250. Retrieved from https://ojs.ides.org.ar/index.php/desarrollo-economico/article/view/237

Issue

Section

Papers