ENDOGENOUS PARTICIPATION
STRENGTHENING PRIOR CONSULTATION IN EXTRACTIVE ECONOMIES
Keywords:
Prior consultation Indigenous movement Hydrocarbons Bolivia EcuadorAbstract
Why and how do institutions strengthen? This ar-ticle offers an explanation of institutional strength based on the study of participatory institutions. Combining the insights of historical institutiona-lism and participatory democracy literatures, it is proposed an endogenous theory of participa-tion and argue that the strength of participatory institutions is dependent on the historic process of their creation and subsequent political incor-poration of the mobilized groups that bring them about. We comparatively study prior consulta-tion in Bolivia and Ecuador since its inception in the 1990s. This institution is highly relevant in Latin America, particularly as countries in the region intensify the extraction of non-renewable resources. We show that different paths of po-litical incorporation of the groups mobilized for institutional adoption were consequential to the resulting institutional strength. Our findings shed light on the tensions between participa-tory democracy and resource extraction in Latin America and have important implications for the study of participatory and political institutions worldwide.
Downloads
References
ABERS, Rebecca (2000). Inventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
ACEMOGLU, Daron y ROBINSON, James A. (2012). Why Nations Fail? The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty. Londres: Profile Books.
ANDOLINA, Robert (1994). “Second Indigenous Uprising Secures Concessions on Agrarian Reform”, Abya Yala News, vol. 8, Nº 3, pp. 19-21.
——— (2003). “The Sovereign and Its Shadow”, Jo- urnal of Latin American Studies, vol. 35, Nº 4, pp. 721-750.
ANRIA, Santiago (2013). “Social Movements, Party Or- ganization, and Populism: A Study of the Bolivian MAS”, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 55, Nº 3, pp. 19-46.
ARJONA, Ana (2015). “Civilian Resistance to Rebel Governance”, en Arjona, Ana, Nelson Kasfir y Za- chariah Mampilly (eds.), Rebel Governance in Civil War, Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 180-202.
——— (2016). Rebelocracy. Social Order in the Colom- bian Civil War. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
BAIOCCHI, Gianpaolo (2005). Militants and Citizens. The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
——— y GANUZA, Ernesto (2015). “When (and How) Did Participation Become Neoliberal? Two Decades of Democratic Experiments and Best Practices in Latin America”, en Lee, Caroline W., Michael McQuarrie y Edward T. Walker (eds.), Democratizing Inequa- lities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. Nueva York: New York University Press.
BAIOCCHI, Gianpaolo, HELLER, Patrick y SILVA, Marcelo K. (2011). Bootstrapping Democracy. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
BASCOPÉ SANJINÉS, Iván (ed.) (2010). Lecciones apren- didas sobre consulta previa. La Paz: CEJIS.
BEATH, Andrew, FOTINI, Christia y ENIKOLOPOV, Rubén (2013). “Empowering Women through Development Aid: Evidence from a Field Experiment in Afghanis- tan”, American Political Science Review, vol. 107, Nº 3, pp. 540-557.
BECKER, Marc (2010). Pachakutik: Indigenous Move- ments and Electoral Politics in Ecuador. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
BJÖRKMAN, Martina y SVENSSON, Jakob (2009). “Power to the People: Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment on Community-Based Monitoring in Uganda”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 124, Nº 2, mayo, pp. 735-769.
BOWEN, James D. (2011). “Multicultural Market Demo- cracy: Elites and Indigenous Movements in Contem- porary Ecuador”, Journal of Latin American Studies, vol. 43, Nº 3: pp. 451-483.
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1984). Distinction. A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
BRINGEL, Breno y FALERO, Alfredo (2016). “Movimientos Sociales, Gobiernos Progresistas y Estado en Amé- rica Latina: transiciones, conflictos y mediaciones”, Caderno crH, vol. 29, Nº 3, Salvador de Bahía, pp. 27-45.
BRINKS, Daniel, LEVITSKY, Steven y MURILLO, M. Victoria (2017). “Understanding Weak Institutions: Concep- tualization, Measurement and Some Theoretical Exploration”, Austin, University of Texas.
BRYSK, Alison (2000). From Tribal Village to Global Villa- ge: Indian Rights and International Relations in Latin America. Redwood: Stanford University Press.
CAMPELLO, Daniela y ZUCCO JR., Cesar (2015). “Merit, Chance, and the International Determinants of Go- vernment Success”, SSRN. Disponible en .
CASEY, Kaherine, GLENNERSTER, Rachel y MIGUEL, Ed- ward (2012). “Reshaping Institutions: Evidence on Aid Impacts Using a Preanalysis Plan”, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, vol. 127, Nº 4, pp. 1-58.
CEJIS [Centro de Estudios Jurídicos e Investigación So- cial] (2004). El gas y el destino de Bolivia, año VIII, Nº 15, marzo, Santa Cruz.
CEPAL [Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe] (2010). Panorama de la Inserción Interna- cional de América Latina y el Caribe, 2009-2010. Santiago de Chile: CEPAL.
CHATTOPADHYAY, Raghabendra y DUFLO, Esther (2004). “Women as Policy Makers: Evidence from a Rando- mized Policy Experiment in India”, Econometrica, vol. 72, Nº 5, pp. 1409-1443.
CHÁVEZ, David (2011). “Prior consultation - Informe Te- mático”. CHUJI, Monica, BERRAONDO, Mikel y DÁVALOS, Pablo (2010). Derechos colectivos de los pueblos y nacionalidades: evaluación de una década 1998-2008. Quito: IWGIA, CONAIE, Tukui Shimi.
CISNEROS, Paul (2012). “Corporate Social Responsibility and Mining Policy in Ecuador”, VI Congreso Lati- noamericano de Ciencia Política, Quito, Flacso, 12 de junio.
COLLIER, Ruth B. y COLLIER, David (1991). Shaping the Political Arena. Critical Junctures, the Labor Mo- vement, and Regime Dynamics in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
COLLOREDO-MANSFELD, Rudolf J. (2009). Fighting Like a Community: Andean Civil Society in an Era of Indian Uprisings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
CONAIE (1994). Proyecto Político de la cONAIE. Quito: CONAIE.
——— (2010). “Asamblea Extraordinaria de la Confede- ración de Pueblos y Nacionalidades de Ecuador”, Unión Base, Pastaza (Ecuador).
CYPHER, James Martín (2010). “South America’s Commo- dities Boom: Developmental Opportunity or Path De- pendent Reversion?”, Canadian Journal of Develop- ment Studies, vol. 30, Nos 3-4, pp. 565-638.
DE LA RIVA MIRANDA, Polo (2011). “Monitoreo Socioam- biental en Territorio Indígena Guaraní”, Artículo Pri- mero, año 14, Nº 21, Santa Cruz, CEJIS, pp. 35-56.
ESCOBAR, Arturo (2010). “Latin America at a Crossroads: Alternative Modernizations, Post-Liberalism, or Post- Development?”, Cultural Studies, vol. 24, Nº 1, pp. 1-65.
FALLETI, Tulia G. y MAHONEY, James (2015). “The Comparative Sequential Method”, en Mahoney, James y Kathleen Thelen (eds.), Advances in Comparative Historical Analysis, Nueva York: Cambridge Univer- sity Press, pp. 211-239.
FEARON, James D., HUMPHREYS, Macartan y WEINSTEIN, Jeremy M. (2009). “Can Development Aid Contri- bute to Social Cohesion after Civil War? Evidence from a Field Experimient in Post-Conflict Liberia”, American Economic Review: Papers & Proceedings, vol. 99, Nº 2, pp. 287-291.
FERNÁNDEZ, Nora (2011). “Informe temático: la consulta previa, un derecho de participación. Documento fi- nal”. Quito: Defensoría del Pueblo del Ecuador.
FISKE, Amelia (2013). “Regulating Oil Operations in the Ecuadorian Amazon”, Latin American Studies Asso- ciation Annual Meeting, Washington, 31 de mayo.
FLEMMER, Riccarda y SCHILLING-VACAFLOR, Almut (2016). “Unfulfilled promises of the consultation approach: the limits to effective indigenous participation in Bolivia’s and Peru’s extractive industries”, Third World Quarterly, vol. 37, Nº 1, pp. 172-188.
FONTAINE, Guillaume (2004). “Actores y Lógicas Racio- nales en los Conflictos Socio-Ambientales: el Caso del Bloque 10 en Ecuador (Pastaza)”, FALCONÍ, Fan- der, HERCOWITZ, Marcelo y MURADIAN, Roldan (eds.), Globalización y Desarrollo en América Latina. Quito: Flacso, pp. 155-172.
FULMER, Amanda M., SNODGRASS GODOY, Angelina y NEFF, Philip (2008). “Indigenous rights, resistance, and the law: Lessons from a Guatemalan mine”, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 50, Nº 4, pp. 91-121.
GARCÍA SERRANO, Fernando (2012). “Estado, Empresas y Pueblos Indígenas: Diálogo Tripartito? La Aplica- ción de la Consulta Previa, Libre e Informada en la Explotación de los Recursos Naturales y en la Apro- bación de Leyes en Ecuador (1999-2012)”, Sucre.
GARGARELLA, Roberto (2013). Latin American Constitu- tionalism 1810-2010. The Engine Room of the Cons- titution. Nueva York: Oxford University Press.
GIUSTI RODRÍGUEZ, Mariana (2017). “Going Beyond Co- Ethnicity: Assessing the Programmatic Reach of Ethnic Cleavages”, Cornell University.
GOLDFRANK, Benjamin (2011). Deepening Local De- mocracy in Latin America: Participation, Decentra- lization, and the Left. University Park: Penn State Press.
GROSSMAN, Guy y BALDASSARRI, Delia (2012). “The Impact of Elections on Cooperation: Evidence from a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Uganda”, American Journal of Political Science, vol. 56, Nº 4, pp. 964- 985.
HAGGARD, Stephan (1990). Pathways from the Periphery: The Politics of Growth in the Newly Industrializing Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
HELLER, Patrick (2001). “Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre”, Politics & Society, vol. 29, Nº 1, pp. 61-81.
HEVIA DE LA JARA, Felipe J. y ISUNZA VERA, Ernesto (2012). “Constrained Participation: the Impact of Consultative Councils on National-Level Policy in Mexico”, en Cameron, Maxwell A., Eric Hershberg y Kenneth E. Sharpe, New Institutions for Participatory Democracy in Latin America. Nueva York: Pelgrave Macmillan, pp. 75-97.
HOLLAND, Alisha C. (2016). “Forbearance”, American Political Science Review, vol. 110, Nº 2, pp. 232-246.
HTUN, Mala (2016). Inclusion without Representation in Latin America. Gender Quotas and Ethnic Reserva- tions. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
HUMPHREYS, Macartan, SÁNCHEZ DE LA SIERRA, Raúl y VAN DER WINDT, Peter (2012). “Social and Economic Impacts of Tuungane: Final Report on the Effects of a Community Driven Reconstruction Program in Eastern Democratic Republic of Congo”, Columbia University.
HUMPHREYS BEBBINGTON, Denise (2012). “Consultation, Compensation and Conflict: Natural Gas Extraction in Weekhayek Territory, Bolivia”, Journal of Latin American Geography, vol. 11, Nº 2, pp. 49-71.
HURTADO, Francisco, VARGAS, Eduardo y CHÁVEZ, David (2011). “Informe temático: la consulta previa, un derecho de participación”. Quito: Defensoría del Pueblo de Ecuador. Disponible en http://re- positorio.dpe.gob.ec/bitstream/39000/120/1/IT-006- CONSULTA%20PREVIA%20UN%20DERECHO%20 DE%20PARTICIPACION.pdf.
JASKOSKI, Maiah (2014). “Environmental Licensing and Conflict in Peru’s Mining Sector: A Path-Dependent Analysis”, World Development, vol. 64, pp. 873- 883.
KNIGHT, Jack (1992). Institutions and Social Conflict. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
LAYTON, Heather M. y PATRINOS, Harry A. (2006). “Es-
timating the Number of Indigenous People in Latin America”, en HALL, Gillette y PATRINOS, Harry A. (eds.), Indigenous Peoples, Poverty, and Human Development in Latin America. Nueva York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 25-39.
LEVITSKY, Steven y MURILLO, María V. (2009). “Variation in institutional strength”, Annual Review of Political Science, vol. 12, pp. 115-133.
——— (2013). “Building Institutions on Weak Foun- dations”, Journal of Democracy, vol. 24, Nº 2, pp. 93-107.
LUCERO, José A. (2003). “Locating the ‘Indian Problem’: Community, Nationality, and Contradiction in Ecua- dorian Indigenous Politics”, Latin American Perspectives, vol. 30, Nº 1, pp. 23-48.
——— (2008). Struggles of Voice. The Politics of Indi- genous Representation in the Andes. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
MADRID, Raúl L. (2012). The Rise of Ethnic Politics in Latin America. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
MAZABANDA, Carlos (2013). “Consulta previa en la décimo primera ronda petrolera. ¿Participación masiva de la ciudadanía”. Disponible en
http:// amazonwatch.org/assets/files/2013-07-consulta- previa-en-la-11a-ronda.pdf.
MAINWARING, Scott y SCULLY, Timothy R. (1995). Building democratic institutions: Party systems in Latin America. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
MAHONEY, James (2000). “Path dependence in historical sociology”, Theory and Society, vol. 29, Nº 4, pp. 507-548.
MCNULTY, Stephanie (2011). Voice and Vote. Decen- tralization and Participation in Post-Fujimori Peru. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
MINISTERIO DE HIDROCARBUROS Y ENERGÍA (2012). Memoria 2010-2011. La Paz: Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
——— (2013). Informe de Gestión 2012. La Paz: Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
——— (2014). Memoria Institucional 2013. La Paz: Es- tado Plurinacional de Bolivia.
MONTAMBEAULT, Françoise (2015). The Politics of Local Participatory Democracy in Latin America: Institu- tions, Actors, and Interactions. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
NORTH, Douglas C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
PELLEGRINI, Lorenzo y RIBERA ARISMENDI, Marco O. (2012). “Consultation, Compensation and Extrac- tion in Bolivia after the ‘Left Turn’: The Case of Oil Exploration in the North of La Paz Department”, Journal of Latin American Geography, vol. 11, Nº 2, pp. 103-120.
PÉREZ CASTELLÓN, Ariel (2011). “Política energética y ‘vivir bien’: algunas herramientas conceptuales y de gestión para tender cables a tierra”, Artículo Primero. Industrias Extractivas: Políticas y Derechos, año 14, Nº 21, Santa Cruz, CEJIS, pp. 65-78.
——— (2013). “Justicia constitucional en Bolivia. Desafíos y oportunidades para la tutela de los derechos de los pueblos indígenas en conflictos socioambientales”, Revista Catalana de Dret Ambiental, vol. IV, Nº 2, pp. 1-47.
PIERSON, Paul (2016). “Power in Historical Institutionalism”, en FIORETOS, Orfeo, FALLETI, Tulia G. y SHEINGATE, Adam (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Historical Institutionalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 124-141.
RAMÍREZ GALLEGOs, Franklin (2010). “Fragmentación, reflujo y desconcierto. Movimientos sociales y cambio político en el Ecuador (2000-2010)”, OSAL, vol. 6, Nº 28, pp. 18-47.
RICE, Roberta (2011). “From the ground up: The challenge of indigenous party consolidation in Latin America”, Party Politics, vol. 17, Nº 2, pp. 171-188.
RIOFRANCOS, Thea N. (2017). “Scaling Democracy: Participation and Resource Extraction in Latin America”, Perspectives on Politics, vol. 15, Nº 3, pp. 678-696.
RIVERA CUSICANQUI, Silvia (1990). “Liberal Democracy and Ayllu Democracy in Bolivia: The Case of Nor- thern Potosí”, Journal of Development Studies, vol. 26, Nº 4, pp. 97-121.
——— (2004). “Reclaiming the Nation”, NAcLA, vol. 39, Nº 3, noviembre-diciembre, pp. 19-23.
RODRÍGUEZ GARAVITO, César (2011). “Ethnicity.gov: glo- bal governance, indigenous peoples, and the right to prior consultation in social minefields”, Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies, vol. 18, Nº 1, pp. 263-305.
——— (2016). Extractivismo versus derechos humanos. Crónicas de los nuevos campos minados en el Sur Global. Buenos Aires: Siglo XXI Editores.
RODRÍGUEZ PIÑERO, Luis (2005). Indigenous Peoples, Post colonialism, and International Law: The ILO Re- gime (1919-1989). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
SAWYER, Suzana (2004). Crude Chronicles: Indigenous Politics, Multinational Oil, and Neoliberalism in Ecua- dor. Durham: Duke University Press.
SCHAVELZON, Salvador (2012). El nacimiento del Estado Plurinacional de Bolivia. Etnografía de una Asam- blea Constituyente. La Paz: CEJIS / Plural Editores.
SCHILLING-VACAFLOR, Almut (2012). “Democratizing resource governance through prior consultations? Lessons from Bolivia’s hydrocarbon sector”, gIgA working papers, Nº 184.
SILVA, Eduardo (2009). Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
SINNOT, Emily, NASH, John y DE LA TORRE, Augusto (2010). Natural Resources in Latin America and the Caribbean: Beyond Booms and Busts? Washington: The World Bank.
SMITH, Graham (2009). Democratic Innovations. Desig- ning institutions for citizen participation. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
STEINMO, Sven, THELEN, Kathleen y LONGSTRETH, Frank (eds.) (1992). Structuring politics: historical insti- tutionalism in comparative analysis. Cambridge y Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
SVAMPA, Maristella (2016). Debates latinoamericos: indianismo, desarrollo, dependencia, populismo. Buenos Aires: Edhasa.
——— (2018). “Latin American Development: Perspec- tives and Debates”, en FALLETI, Tulia G. y PARRADO, Emilio (eds.), Latin America Since the Left Turn, Phi- ladelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, cap. 1.
TOCKMAN, Jason y CAMERON, John (2014). “Indigenous Autonomy and the Contradictions of Plurinationalism in Bolivia”, Latin American Politics and Society, vol. 56, Nº 3, pp. 46-69.
THELEN, Kathleen (2004). How Institutions Evolve. The Political Economy of Skills in Germany, Britain, the United States, and Japan. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
——— y MAHONEY, James (2015). “Comparative-Histo- rical Analysis in Contemporary Political Science”, en Mahoney, James y Kathleen Thelen (eds.), Advan- ces in Comparative Historical Analysis. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3-36.
VAN COTT, Donna (1998). “Ecuador Ratifies ILO Con- vention 169”, Native Americas, vol. 2, Nº 11, 30 de junio.
——— (2005). From movements to parties in Latin Ame- rica: The evolution of ethnic politics. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
——— (2008). Radical Democracy in the Andes. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
WAMPLER, Brian (2008). “When does participatory demo- cracy deepen the quality of democracy? Lessons from Brazil”, Comparative Politics, vol. 41, Nº 1, pp. 61-81.
WEBER, Max (1978) [1922]. Economy and Society. An Outline of Interpretive Sociology. Berkeley y Los Angeles: University of California Press.
YASHAR, Deborah (2005). Contesting Citizenship in La- tin America: the rise of indigenous movements and the postliberal challenge. Nueva York: Cambridge University Press.
ZAREMBERG, Gisela, ISUNZA VERA, Ernesto y GURZA LAVA-
LLE, Adrian (2018). “The Gattopardo Era: Innovation and Representation in Mexico in Post-Neoliberal Ti- mes”, en FALLETI, Tulia G. y PARRADO, Emilio (eds.), Latin America Since the Left Turn. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, cap. 12.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Manuscript acceptance by the Journal implies the simultaneous non-submission to any other journal or publishing house, and the non-exclusive transmission of the author´s patrimonial rights in favor of the editor, who allows the post-print version use, under the Licencia Creative Commnos Atribución-NoComercial-Compartir Obras Derivadas Igual 4.0 Internacional (CC-BY-NC.SA 4.0) (http://creativecommons.org/licences/by-nc-sa/4.0/deed.es). Articles can be shared, copied, distributed, modified, altered, transformed into a derivative work, executed and publicly communicated, provided a) the authors and the original publication (Journal, Publisher and URL) are mentioned, b) they are not used for commercial purposes, c) the same terms of the license are maintained.
It is hereby stated that the mentioned manuscript has not been published and that it is not being printed in any other national or foreign journal.
The authors hereby accept the necessary modifications, suggested by the reviewers, in order to adapt the manuscript to the style and publication rules of this Journal.
